Teaching American Democracy with Harvard Business School

The Case Method Institute

Harvard Business School might not seem the likeliest home to an institute designed to improve high school civic education or host a professional development for teachers. However, I was privileged to spend part of my spring break working with the faculty of the Case Method Project at Harvard Business School, and teachers from around the nation on the use of case method teaching. Timing couldn’t have been any better because I plan on introducing my Government & Politics students to their first case on Monday.

Prior to the Case Method Project I was not familiar with case method teaching, but it is a inquiry based pedagogical strategy that has been used for years at Harvard Business School. Focusing on the use of case studies and socratic questioning to unpack and uncover content, the discussion of real-life situations places students in the historical narratives(Hammond, 1980). By providing students with the same information available to those who lived the case, participants are forced to make their own decisions, and by extension make their own meaning of the world. In the hands of Dr. David Moss, the case method strategy was aimed at American Democracy first at Harvard, but over the past few years it has grown into the Case Method Institute which helps train and partner with teachers to deepen students civic understanding .

Prior to the Covid-19 pandemic the teacher workshops were held on-campus during the summer months. While I would have enjoyed the trip to Cambridge, thankfully CMI has pivoted with the rest of the educational world to offering a virtual experience. It was in this context that I spent my break reading a case narrative titled Martin Luther King and the Struggle for Black Voting Rights (1965).

In case method teaching students are first asked to wrestle with the story, and then work with peers to clarify their understanding and share initial thoughts. However it is in the whole group discussion where the powerful and deep learning occurs. Through a shared experience of guided questioning, students drive the unpacking of the case as they share ideas, ask question, provide evidence and challenge each other. The power lies not in what is memorized, but instead on what can be uncovered.

A well known truth of constructivism is that learning needs to be anchored in the knowledge students bring to the classroom (Vygotsky, 1978). The case method builds on this by providing easy access for all students to connect their own experiences with the case, regardless of their skill set. By centering the learning on student voice and opinion, all students have an avenue to participate. It is through this mutual entry point that case method teaching allows students of various backgrounds, reading levels and public speaking skills the chance to place themselves in the shoes of historical figures facing uncertain paths. As the Case Method Institute emphasizes, it is through the planned improvisation with these unstructured problems that the learning occurs.

I can’t wait for Monday…

For those interested in learning more or participating in the training, more can be learned via the Case Method Project website.

References

Hammond, J. S. (1980). Learning by the case method. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Mindfulness and creativity: Implications for thinking and learning – New Publication

Creativity has long been viewed as a crucial skill for teachers, as well as a key target for development amongst students. Mindfulness on the other hand has gained popularity more recently in education, as student well-being and mental health needs are thought about more deeply. I recently had the wonderful opportunity to join two amazing educators in exploring the literature that examines relationship between these two areas, and how that relationship impacts the world of education. Citation, link to the article, and abstract are below.

Henriksen D., Richardson C., Shack K. (2020) Mindfulness and creativity: Implications for thinking and learning. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37

Abstract: Mindfulness and creativity have both come to the forefront of educational interest—but a better understanding of their relationship and the implications for education is needed. This article reviews the literature on the intersection of these topics in order to understand where and how these two related but distinctive areas of research connect, and how this pertains to the complexity of education settings. Our goal is to understand findings from the literature and consider the implications for educational practice and research, with an eye to how mindfulness can be supportive to learners’ creativity. This thematic review and qualitative analysis of extant literature identifies four themes that speak to the connection between mindfulness and creativity. There is solid evidence to show a generally beneficial and supportive relationship, in that practicing mindfulness can support creativity—but many factors affect this and there are a range of considerations for practice. This article reflects on the key findings of scholarly work on the mindfulness-creativity relationship with interpretative discussion and implications for educational research and practice.